|
|||||||
| Article Discussion Discuss the latest articles here |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Writer/editor/photo taker
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In transit
Posts: 2,109
Rep Power: 6818 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
REVIEW: 2011 Rocky Mountain Slayer 70
I spent the last three months ripping it up on Rocky Mountain's newly redesigned Slayer all-mountain bike. There were some very good things about the bike, but there were also a few things that didn't sit right.
Read the full review to see what fell into each category.
__________________
************************************* She said, why don't you stop your crying/ Go outside and ride your bike - Sliver, Nirvana "If stars were all that mattered, why would I go to the trouble of writing a review?" - Roger Ebert |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Made In Canada|Living in USA
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 12197 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As always, great review Stuart!!
The RM folks don't recommend running a Coil shock on this bike since it relies heavily on Propedal for climbing efficiency and that with a coil it would be too active (e.g. would bob). I know the test bike's RP23 had issues with the propedal setting, but did you find yourself wanting more platform? Was the shock constant on longer descents? No heating up issues? thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Voice of Reason
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: @ Woodlot
Posts: 312
Rep Power: 559590 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well written thorough review. Very nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Whistler
Posts: 746
Rep Power: 821795 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Cable routing
Routing cables under the BB is problematic. On my ride, one cable goes there - the front derailleur cable. The front derailleur fails every time I ride in the rain. Having more cables go there means more problems. I wish they would give these bikes to a mechanic at the end of the design process for a final filtering through common sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,506
Rep Power: 5733283 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: in North Vancouver and elsewhere
Posts: 6,358
Rep Power: 1933275 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
very thorough review!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Van
Posts: 7,339
Rep Power: 5191786 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Excellent review.
__________________
www.roostoutfitters.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 675
Rep Power: 98306 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Great review Stuart, well written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Okanagan
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 19279 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This is the kind of honest and in-depth review that I wish existed for more bikes, to help potential buyers evaluate different steeds. From one tall rider to another, I share your desire for longer top tubes. I'm sure a shorter cockpit is desirable on the descent, but when you spend 75% of the ride going up you may as well be comfortable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
beast
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: whistler
Posts: 2,030
Rep Power: 2491532 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
good review.
that bb height sounds good to me, but its just a matter of preference. i hate short bikes too, but you could always go a size up. its such a long wheelbase already though. formula "one" brakes are light and powerful, but do lack modulation compared to elixir's (for example). also, the levers are indeed a long reach away. even dialed all the way in, i had to bend my blades in a vice to bring them closer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Van
Posts: 112
Rep Power: 153 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nice work Stu. Great review.
I love my 2011 Slayer. The BB height wasn't or isn't really an issue for me. The Slayer kills it on any terrain! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
administurbator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The North Shore
Posts: 8,427
Rep Power: 666 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You are running a coil aren't you Eamonn. What's your feeling about that? (note - Eamonn rides for us and is sponsored by RMB)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Made In Canada|Living in USA
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 12197 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks homie!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Thank you Stuart - indeed a very good review!
But I have a view questions left: - how tall are you to find the XL more on the small side? - What do you think about using the Slayer in a bikepark a few times a year? |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Writer/editor/photo taker
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In transit
Posts: 2,109
Rep Power: 6818 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for the props, everyone. Really appreciate it. All of us at nsmb put a lot of time and effort into our reviews, and it's very cool to hear that it's useful for you.
Questions... More platform - no, I didn't really feel like it needed more. It would have been nice to feel a more distinct difference between the settings, so hopefully that will be better on the production version. Shock heating up - no, didn't notice that or reduced performance on downhills. The BB height thing - yes, clarklewis, it is personal personal preference. It wasn't stunningly low, just lower than I'm used to and probably lower than I would like. I hit roots and rocks on my regular XC loop that I don't on my personal bike (Giant Reign). My height - firevsh2o, I'm 6' 4" with about a 35" inseam. I run the saddle at ~85cm from the center of the BB. Using the Slayer in the bike park a couple of times a year - Sure, why not. You'll want to change the rubber, but other than that, you should be fine. Your rims will likely take a beating, though. refresh - If I was designing this bike for tall riders, I'd make the horizontal top tube at least 25", the seat tube at least 21" and raise the BB by 1/2". The current size is all right, depending on your body type, but I'd throw a leg over one to double check.
__________________
************************************* She said, why don't you stop your crying/ Go outside and ride your bike - Sliver, Nirvana "If stars were all that mattered, why would I go to the trouble of writing a review?" - Roger Ebert |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Brand new still in the box Rocky Mountain XTSX 70 | Peninsula Cycles | The Inside Line | 1 | 12-12-2009 08:39 PM |
| Rocky Mountain Altitude Demo Day | Secret Cycles | The Inside Line | 5 | 12-08-2009 06:54 AM |
| Rocky Mountain Slayer SXC 70 Frame $700 on Chainlove right now | boomforeal | Gear | 8 | 11-19-2009 09:09 AM |
| NS News Article on Council Meeting | Sharon | The Shore | 8 | 03-15-2004 10:33 PM |