View Full Version : 2005 rotec RL9
tomatoz
10-14-2004, 09:11 PM
hi guys this is the new rotec sulley made, it is completly different then the old one, lawill design! longer front end and shorter rear end, 17.25 chain stays!!!! and SUPER LOW standover! (like turner)
the pic is just a proto, i will have pic of it build up soon,
http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/pbpic318892.jpg
http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/pbpic321237.jpg
http://www.mertlawwill.com/images/rotec_lawwill_proto00.jpg
Stinky_Rider
10-14-2004, 10:34 PM
I'm sorry
but that is the sexiest frame I've ever seen, and I want one.
Nelson
10-14-2004, 11:16 PM
Hot stuff. Color is weak though.
corey@nsmb.com
10-15-2004, 02:00 AM
Hot Damn. That looks beautiful!
Nice work Sulley :thepimp:
DangerousDean
10-15-2004, 07:38 AM
wowie..
i want a blue one :heart:
aShogunNamedMarcus
10-15-2004, 10:28 AM
That looks like a winner :drool:
Look at the phatness of the headtube junction - McBeefy! With a steering dampning mount as well.
Any idea of MSRP?
Mountain Dewd
10-15-2004, 12:21 PM
looks sweet, but i gotta say i hate the graphics and color, pretty ugly imo.
sick design though, good to see rotec getting away from the stretch limo bikes.
just ride
10-15-2004, 01:19 PM
i personally like the old ones better.. but maybe its just the colour :S
looks very burly and light at the same time!
Keefer
10-16-2004, 01:23 AM
Yea, that looks killer.
Originally posted by Nelson
Hot stuff. Color is weak though.
That's so fucking sick I'm gonna puke.
Trini-dad72
10-16-2004, 12:08 PM
The shock isn't connected to the frame, it remoinds me of the original Tomac 204Magnum rear end.
http://www.nw-mountainbike.com/Media/TOMAC.jpg
Notice the similarities? Anyway it doesn't matter. I loved the Tomac, and I love that Rotec. I dig how the chainstay has remained the same, and the new upper section just adds to the sexiness.
KOW49
10-16-2004, 03:25 PM
Originally posted by jaru72
The shock isn't connected to the frame, it remoinds me of the original Tomac 204Magnum rear end.
http://www.nw-mountainbike.com/Media/TOMAC.jpg
Notice the similarities? Anyway it doesn't matter. I loved the Tomac, and I love that Rotec. I dig how the chainstay has remained the same, and the new upper section just adds to the sexiness.
lawill design design
peachy-B
10-17-2004, 12:54 AM
I do agree. that is one sexy frame. especially the yellow section. whew! nice curves. (the bike that is)
I wish VP-Free could have tubings like that... I would be buying one ASAP.
Islandrider
10-17-2004, 02:10 AM
frame: :drool:
Color: puke
Biking Fiend
10-17-2004, 10:34 AM
can someone qoute felix for the link, he is on my ignore list and this time he actually posted soemthing usefull
Trini-dad72
10-17-2004, 12:20 PM
http://bb.nsmb.com/newforum/attachment.php?s=&postid=860149
Does that work?
NickS
10-17-2004, 06:55 PM
looks pretty cool, my friends old yeti with lawill was awsome, this should be sweet.
Painting_of_Rebelion
10-17-2004, 07:14 PM
Nice frame, but the rear end is so damn similar to the Profile DH frame...
Rosscofat
10-17-2004, 07:18 PM
^^^ thats what I was thinking but it looks a bit more beef bigger pivots?
Painting_of_Rebelion
10-17-2004, 07:24 PM
yeah kinda, but the big paralell links SCREAM Profile.
tomatoz
10-18-2004, 12:22 AM
Originally posted by wisc fr-rider
looks sweet, but i gotta say i hate the graphics and color, pretty ugly imo.
sick design though, good to see rotec getting away from the stretch limo bikes.
wtf..the limo bike is the 2002 one....my 2004 one is much shorter
tomatoz
10-18-2004, 12:24 AM
Originally posted by Nelson
Hot stuff. Color is weak though.
he only got the frame the nite before interbike, and yellow was all he had so he had to paint it at the hotel the nite before interbike, also the stickers are from 04 bikes and i am sure sulley is gonna make new once for the 05
tomatoz
10-18-2004, 12:27 AM
Originally posted by aShogunNamedMarcus
Any idea of MSRP?
he said prob gonna be $300 more then wat the 04 frame retails for....$$2495us frame kit?
vBulletin® v3.7.0 Release Candidate 2, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.