View Full Version : rubbish
wgchase
05-26-2004, 11:18 PM
http://www.derekpearson.com/baad.jpg
Battlecat
05-26-2004, 11:19 PM
I like it and I am sure ross will to:thepimp:
that is such a sweet pic
the front whell looks cool
dudski
05-26-2004, 11:21 PM
that wall looks like it screams crazy combonations.
wgchase
05-26-2004, 11:31 PM
whooosh
http://www.derekpearson.com/baad2.jpg
01shore_rida
05-26-2004, 11:33 PM
ooooooooooo sick
Shocker
05-26-2004, 11:34 PM
That kid in the second pic looks angry. :lol:
wgchase
05-26-2004, 11:39 PM
dont front
http://www.derekpearson.com/baad3.jpg
http://www.derekpearson.com/baad4.jpg
wgchase
05-26-2004, 11:43 PM
420 homeslice
http://www.derekpearson.com/mtb/ho7.jpg
Derek, did you happen to get a picture of a kid on a Kona Chute with a sherman? I was sucking it up as it was my first time on a bike in 7 months....but if you managed to snap one I'd love to see it.
The Ito
.glib
05-26-2004, 11:43 PM
The aspect ratio on that second shot (that would be Measures yes?) looks a little weird. Maybe it's just a wide angle lense?
<extremely technical photo comment about some nitpicky detail here>
I like your stuff as always.
wgchase
05-26-2004, 11:49 PM
Originally posted by .glib
The aspect ratio on that second shot (that would be Measures yes?) looks a little weird. Maybe it's just a wide angle lense?
<extremely technical photo comment about some nitpicky detail here>
I like your stuff as always.
you are correct sir and thankyou
blinded
05-26-2004, 11:49 PM
Originally posted by derekpearson
420 homeslice
Holy crap, that colour picture is hecka sharp sharp sharp! That is my favorite one! That is a picture you show to someone if they are wondering if pro lenses are worth it
pedalfile
05-27-2004, 12:02 AM
the first shot of ross is good, but harookz got the better angle/ shot on that stunt by ross the boss.
Chump
05-27-2004, 12:03 AM
Remember he is amature, Harookz is pro. Derek is trying his best ok!
Steve
wgchase
05-27-2004, 12:05 AM
Originally posted by pedalfile
the first shot of ross is good, but harookz got the better angle/ shot on that stunt by ross the boss.
tsk tsk. nobodys trying to outshine your heeero:friend:
wgchase
05-27-2004, 12:07 AM
Originally posted by Chump
amature
steve, you must have found yourself a dictionary! I almost fell into my soup I was so surprised! :rocker:
Brad Dawg
05-27-2004, 12:08 AM
Originally posted by pedalfile
the first shot of ross is good, but harookz got the better angle/ shot on that stunt by ross the boss.
OH LORD!!!!!!! its no competition here KYLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i like the shot myself.... everyone likes different things.....
BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!! anal
pedalfile
05-27-2004, 12:10 AM
Originally posted by derekpearson
tsk tsk. nobodys trying to outshine your heeero:friend:
please dont give me a black eye like the model in you sig. :(
Chump
05-27-2004, 12:12 AM
Cool never knew teachers grade us on this board. Good thing they don't grade some of the amatchure art on here. Who knows what would go on.
Steve
wgchase
05-27-2004, 12:13 AM
Originally posted by pedalfile
please dont give me a black eye like the model in you sig. :(
I'll give you two.
now....
http://www.derekpearson.com/shoot1/aha.jpg
pedalfile
05-27-2004, 12:15 AM
if you give me two then i wont be able to see your "rubbish" digital pictures then will i?
Chump
05-27-2004, 12:16 AM
Now there is some black eyes if I have ever seen some
http://derekpearson.com/images/eyes.jpg
Steve
wgchase
05-27-2004, 12:17 AM
Originally posted by pedalfile
if you give me two then i wont be able to see your "rubbish" digital pictures then will i?
if by "pictures" you mean art, then i suppose you are right:idea:
bullit_kid
05-27-2004, 12:20 AM
Thanks DP i like it alot ! :)
BuckChoklit
05-27-2004, 12:21 AM
Guys lay off Derek's pictars, his wananbe amateur pornstars are hot! FUCK! look at the peroxide on that one broad...
BuckChoklit
05-27-2004, 12:22 AM
Originally posted by derekpearson
if by "pictures" you mean art, then i suppose you are right:idea:
What makes your pictures art, do you think you're above pictures? I mean fuck, you use a metal picture film box to capture colours and shapes don't you? That is a picture silly.
BOUCH
05-27-2004, 12:24 AM
shut up chump ur a n00b u should quit crying because he didnt take pictures of you and, its to bad ur jelouse of everyone thinking his shots are cool like they use to think urs were calmm down chump. Hey STEVIN to bad he didnt have 1000000000 pictures of a stupid bridge and a lame blue mustang
BuckChoklit
05-27-2004, 12:24 AM
What version of Photoshop do you use to clean up your pictures?
wgchase
05-27-2004, 12:25 AM
Originally posted by BuckChoklit
What makes your pictures art, do you think you're above pictures? I mean fuck, you use a metal picture film box to capture colours and shapes don't you? That is a picture silly.
ahahahahahahahahaah
:D
Chump
05-27-2004, 12:25 AM
Originally posted by BOUCH
shut up chump ur a n00b u should quit crying because he didnt take pictures of you and, its to bad ur jelouse of everyone thinking his shots are cool like they use to think urs were calmm down chump.
This has nothing to do with if he didn't take pictures of me or not.
Heck I didn't even wanna go for the pictures I never said that I just wanted to ride with a bro. Lets not go there you have heard the whole story. I said Derek is trying his best! What else do you want me to say?
Steve
wgchase
05-27-2004, 12:27 AM
Originally posted by bullit_kid
Thanks DP i like it alot ! :)
you bet :)
Chump
05-27-2004, 12:30 AM
Cool.
Take my actions how you want. If that is what is seems to you then make your assumptions. I think I will stay here thanks, I like Vancouver actually.
Steve
bullit_kid
05-27-2004, 12:31 AM
Originally posted by Chump
Cool.
Take my actions how you want. If that is what is seems to you then make your assumptions. I think I will stay here thanks, I like Vancouver actually.
Steve
then dont move to kamloops u goon
Chump
05-27-2004, 12:32 AM
Cool I miss you being on Bicycle Rockers. Funny how Idun used to suck.
Steve
fergs
05-27-2004, 12:35 AM
Originally posted by derekpearson
I'll give you two.
now....
http://www.derekpearson.com/shoot1/aha.jpg
I dig the pink! :D reminds me of my g/f :D
Hey Derek, on the b&w mtb shots were you going for more of a hi-key shot? I'm just wondering why the lack of contrast. Tack-sharp though! There's a ps plugin call Focal Blade that some people swear by rather than using USM. I haven't tried it myself, it could be interesting.
.glib
05-27-2004, 12:35 AM
I can't even tell who hates who anymore :(.
I'm gonna need two sides, each with their own cheer (minimum 6 rhyming lines), logo, and uniforms, with full roster sheets on my desk by the end of the day.
wgchase
05-27-2004, 12:37 AM
Originally posted by .glib
I can't even tell who hates who anymore :(.
I'm gonna need two sides, each with their own cheer (minimum 6 rhyming lines), logo, and uniforms, with full roster sheets on my desk by the end of the day.
hahaha. made my night :lol:
i dont know!??!?!. I just posted up some pics of the local boys and I get assaulted!!:dizzy:
h4mst3r
05-27-2004, 12:38 AM
i really dig your pics dp, i like your style
things i tend to look for in photos personally are frozen motion, clarity, contrast and colour
and you deliver the goods!
wgchase
05-27-2004, 12:40 AM
Originally posted by fergs
I dig the pink! :D reminds me of my g/f :D
Hey Derek, on the b&w mtb shots were you going for more of a hi-key shot? I'm just wondering why the lack of contrast. Tack-sharp though! There's a ps plugin call Focal Blade that some people swear by rather than using USM. I haven't tried it myself, it could be interesting.
Hey man!
yeah i whomped the levels in those :)
I actually bought the fred miranda sharpening plug in and love it!
its really inexpensive and Ive been really impressed!
Brad Dawg
05-27-2004, 12:41 AM
there seems to be some sort of miscommunication between some board members here....
if you only knew who was writing some of the stuff on here, you should be able to tell by the horrible spelling/grammar! hahaahahah
BuckChoklit
05-27-2004, 12:46 AM
Originally posted by BuckChoklit
What version of Photoshop do you use to clean up your pictures?
Still wondering? I'm looking into buying a copy of it and I figure if I have the same one as you I can bastardize my shit aswell.
h4mst3r
05-27-2004, 12:48 AM
:|
.glib
05-27-2004, 12:53 AM
Wow that Focal Blade has some impressive examples to say the least!
wgchase
05-27-2004, 12:54 AM
Originally posted by BuckChoklit
Still wondering? I'm looking into buying a copy of it and I figure if I have the same one as you I can bastardize my shit aswell.
sorry I didnt get right back to you! My apologies! Ive been fending off other attacks. Now let me see - that would be photoshop version 6.0.
If I can be of any further assistance to you, please just ask. I always appreciate such civility!
On a side note, the picture of ross that started this whole bashfest was actually -originally a picture I took of the sunset a few nights ago. Ive gotten rather good at this photoshop, no?!
h4mst3r
05-27-2004, 01:00 AM
did you boink that blonde?
wgchase
05-27-2004, 01:07 AM
Originally posted by fergs
I dig the pink! :D reminds me of my g/f :D
Hey Derek, on the b&w mtb shots were you going for more of a hi-key shot? I'm just wondering why the lack of contrast. Tack-sharp though! There's a ps plugin call Focal Blade that some people swear by rather than using USM. I haven't tried it myself, it could be interesting.
Ive been going over old photos with the fm sharpening tool and Im really amazed at the difference. Heres another with the plug in
http://www.derekpearson.com/mtb/ho.jpg
h4mst3r
05-27-2004, 01:08 AM
does it print out sharp too?
wgchase
05-27-2004, 01:13 AM
Originally posted by h4mst3r
does it print out sharp too?
sharp as a tack. I havent tried anything over 12x18 yet, but they print out beautiful at that size.
h4mst3r
05-27-2004, 01:14 AM
how does it work? do you lasso what you want to be sharpened or is it for teh whole thing?
wgchase
05-27-2004, 01:18 AM
Originally posted by h4mst3r
how does it work? do you lasso what you want to be sharpened or is it for teh whole thing?
nope, just select the whole picture (or whatever you want to call it;) ) and hit the level of sharpening you want. From 1 to 20. It finds the edges through some algorithm and selectively sharpens. Its really pretty cool.
.glib
05-27-2004, 01:20 AM
Originally posted by derekpearson
nope, just select the whole picture (or whatever you want to call it;) ) and hit the level of sharpening you want. From 1 to 20. It finds the edges through some algorithm and selectively sharpens. Its really pretty cool.
Can it increase my penis size by 1-3" in just 30 days?
wgchase
05-27-2004, 01:25 AM
Originally posted by .glib
Can it increase my penis size by 1-3" in just 30 days?
actually it does nothing to size. It may sharpen it up for you though!
Islandrider
05-27-2004, 12:37 PM
Your all losers exept for Derek. Rad pics man!
NelsonRyder
05-27-2004, 01:46 PM
hey derek....its spelt amature, not amatchure:rolleyes:
.glib
05-27-2004, 02:51 PM
Originally posted by NelsonRyder
hey derek....its spelt amature, not amatchure:rolleyes:
You are a tower of pure intelligence.
wgchase
05-27-2004, 03:14 PM
Originally posted by .glib
You are a tower of pure intelligence.
:lol:
Universe
05-27-2004, 03:24 PM
Originally posted by BOUCH
I say u try ur best to look like THE MAN HOMMIE throwin out dis's bling bling watches bling bridge picture. All i no is it seemed to me like u were about to cry when the guy didnt wanna take a picture of u. Go back to the bridge
:D
Chump
05-27-2004, 03:36 PM
Originally posted by BOUCH
I say u try ur best to look like THE MAN HOMMIE throwin out dis's bling bling watches bling bridge picture. All i no is it seemed to me like u were about to cry when the guy didnt wanna take a picture of u. Go back to the bridge
Originally posted by Demo9
:D
:thepimp:
Steve
Battlecat
05-27-2004, 03:49 PM
What do you guys not like about the pics?
I think they are awsome. Do i not look at it properly or somefin?
The_Real_Yeti
05-27-2004, 03:52 PM
nice ladies in your signature:D
BuckChoklit
05-27-2004, 04:01 PM
What the hell, I guess they really aren't photos at all then. I now understand where you're "art" stance comes from. Photoography has a certain beauty to it. A raw sense of beauty. Yours do not, you've completely ruined the integrity of an art-form. People will never know if what you're producing is a real photo or just some altered image... It's a damn shame really, this type of crap is ruining the photography industry for the people who actually deserve it. The pure ones. Guys like Streling and Serfas... This digital photoshop shit is ruining the world, I hope people will see through it and go back to appreciating real photographs.
Universe
05-27-2004, 04:11 PM
Originally posted by BuckChoklit
What the hell, I guess they really aren't photos at all then. I now understand where you're "art" stance comes from. Photoography has a certain beauty to it. A raw sense of beauty. Yours do not, you've completely ruined the integrity of an art-form. People will never know if what you're producing is a real photo or just some altered image... It's a damn shame really, this type of crap is ruining the photography industry for the people who actually deserve it. The pure ones. Guys like Streling and Serfas... This digital photoshop shit is ruining the world, I hope people will see through it and go back to appreciating real photographs.
Having to listen to live music only must really suck.
wgchase
05-27-2004, 04:15 PM
Originally posted by BuckChoklit
What the hell, I guess they really aren't photos at all then. I now understand where you're "art" stance comes from. Photoography has a certain beauty to it. A raw sense of beauty. Yours do not, you've completely ruined the integrity of an art-form. People will never know if what you're producing is a real photo or just some altered image... It's a damn shame really, this type of crap is ruining the photography industry for the people who actually deserve it. The pure ones. Guys like Streling and Serfas... This digital photoshop shit is ruining the world, I hope people will see through it and go back to appreciating real photographs.
does this mean I wasted my post telling you which version of photoshop to buy?? :mad:
NickS
05-27-2004, 04:22 PM
Good pics, i see nothing wrong they all look good, Some photoshop is good, dont hate change just accept it.
Rosscofat
05-27-2004, 04:28 PM
I like em like usual.. hopefully ill be just as good someday.. first I need a better camera haha
pedalfile
05-27-2004, 04:30 PM
Originally posted by BP
What do you guys not like about the pics?
I think they are awsome. Do i not look at it properly or somefin?
i said it was a good pic :)
Chump
05-27-2004, 04:32 PM
Originally posted by Rosscofat
I like em like usual.. hopefully ill be just as good someday.. first I need a better camera haha
Equipment only has so much to do with photography. Your mind is yor limitation. What makes you see something to take a picture of your camera or your eye?
Steve
Rosscofat
05-27-2004, 04:36 PM
to have the focus and range and options with better camera makes you better photorapher... I can see it all but if I dont have the right equipment I cant capture it like It should be..
my camera can never capture the clearness of his, and we are talking digital here not film.. film is cheep
RoBurban
05-27-2004, 04:48 PM
Originally posted by BuckChoklit
What the hell, I guess they really aren't photos at all then. I now understand where you're "art" stance comes from. Photoography has a certain beauty to it. A raw sense of beauty. Yours do not, you've completely ruined the integrity of an art-form. People will never know if what you're producing is a real photo or just some altered image... It's a damn shame really, this type of crap is ruining the photography industry for the people who actually deserve it. The pure ones. Guys like Streling and Serfas... This digital photoshop shit is ruining the world, I hope people will see through it and go back to appreciating real photographs.
hey buddy. film photographers do just as much tweaking with chemicals in the darkroom as digital photographers use photoshop. so if you hate on digital photography you might as well hate on film cause it's not like jusT BECAUSE IT"S ON FILM DOESN"T MEAN IT HASN"T BEEN MODIFIED IN SOME WAY TO SUIT THE PHOTOGRAPHERS TASTE> SORRy MY KEYBOARD GOT SPILLED ON> :?
Chump
05-27-2004, 04:53 PM
Originally posted by BOUCH
Correction u suck, im not sponsairdddddd by ane one this sint bouch u CHUMP, respond in the video post after i owned u like a week back u suck at photography u cant south my soul ill tell u who can CAM@NSMB.COm hes an amazing photgrapher. Before the chump started posting his bridge pics brad mckay use to post 1 foot can can pics taken bye the real soul soother.
Just to let u no now that u hang outt with ur new crew doesnt mean ur better than every one, maby u should think whyy quite a few people left/ are leaving that crew cause they may have realised that thinking ur better than everyone isnt gonna help anyone out anywhere or make u any freiends except the kind that think there better than u.
Your not better than anyone else in this world. Think about that next time u go out and dis amature filmakers/photgraphers/any kinda artist.
Never did say anything about I was better then you or not Dylan. Never said Dereks photos sucked. Go look back. Find those words.
If you think cause I have some new rad dudes that I have met here and made friends with makes me thing I am better then you then I don't know where you are coming from!
Glad you took the time to add more to your posts.
Steve
blinded
05-27-2004, 04:57 PM
Derek-san
I'm upgrading to a digital system, probably Nikon and I need some info. I know what kind of stuff you shoot with, but could you just list yer main equipment and experience with it for all of us to read?
I'm still keeping my film setup, I just need a digi slr for what I'm getting into!
Thanks D!
wgchase
05-27-2004, 05:00 PM
Originally posted by blinded
Derek-san
I'm upgrading to a digital system, probably Nikon and I need some info. I know what kind of stuff you shoot with, but could you just list yer main equipment and experience with it for all of us to read?
I'm still keeping my film setup, I just need a digi slr for what I'm getting into!
Thanks D!
Im not a nikon man though- dont know if it would help you?!
blinded
05-27-2004, 05:06 PM
Originally posted by BuckChoklit
What the hell, I guess they really aren't photos at all then. I now understand where you're "art" stance comes from. Photoography has a certain beauty to it. A raw sense of beauty. Yours do not, you've completely ruined the integrity of an art-form. People will never know if what you're producing is a real photo or just some altered image... It's a damn shame really, this type of crap is ruining the photography industry for the people who actually deserve it. The pure ones. Guys like Streling and Serfas... This digital photoshop shit is ruining the world, I hope people will see through it and go back to appreciating real photographs.
I can't tell who is joking or not in this thread so I will probably come off as a total dick.
Using photoshop is just like using the darkroom, just in a different medium. You are talking out of your ass if you say that photoshop = death of photography. Go ask Sterling or whoever is your photo god how much they use photoshop when they are scanning their images. It is hard to explain to someone that is so ignorant and hard pressed on "original" photography. The darkroom is photoshop, photoshop is the darkroom, but on different scales.
With your argument everyone should be photographing with pinhole box cameras and silver sheet film from the 1900's.
If you are just being sarcastic I'm sorry!
wgchase
05-27-2004, 05:08 PM
Originally posted by blinded
ignorant !
you wasted a lot of words when you could have just said that :P
Rosscofat
05-27-2004, 05:17 PM
I just got focal blade.. and wowy it makes quite the diff in the pictures!
wgchase
05-27-2004, 05:17 PM
This thread is like a train wreck haha.
I do understand that I am not the best photographer in the world and dont think I have ever tried to come across that way? So the next time I post - you dont have to get the immediate need to remind me of it :lol:
Also buckchicklet - if you dont open up my threades, your blood pressure will stay on a normal level, youll be healthier and it will save us all from your obscene ignorance! It's what they call in business school a win win situation!!
pedalfile, when I posted pictures in this thread, I didnt mean to give you the impression I was trying to one up your man:dizzy:
Shocker
05-27-2004, 05:20 PM
BEEEEEAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMM
Rosscofat
05-27-2004, 05:23 PM
I think a photo is a photo? why do angles have to be better then others or photoshoped more then others.. who cares he took the pic.. I think ross messures is very happy with the picture..
pilgrim
05-27-2004, 05:23 PM
I love the first one derek. :)
blinded
05-27-2004, 05:24 PM
Originally posted by derekpearson
This thread is like a train wreck haha.
Derek is a much better photographer than most of the people that choose to be wankers over him posting a few pictures. He is doing what he loves, getting paid for it, taking pictures of ladies, going to races, etc. I don't think he gives a shit what any of you think is real art or not, so why bother turning his threads into a shit fest? I'm pretty sure Derek is the one that is selling his photos, not you, that gives him alot more right to speak freely about "art" and photography than any of you shit disturbers will.
If I were him, I'd stop posting pictures on these forums, obviously alot of you don't appreciate it. That is what I'd do, it is a good thing hes alot more mellow than me.
I'm defending someone I haven't even met because everyones ignorance shines through on this stupid art vs photography , digital vs film whatever.
NelsonRyder
05-27-2004, 05:28 PM
Originally posted by blinded
Derek is a much better photographer than most of the people that choose to be wankers over him posting a few pictures. He is doing what he loves, getting paid for it, taking pictures of ladies, going to races, etc. I don't think he gives a shit what any of you think is real art or not, so why bother turning his threads into a shit fest? I'm pretty sure Derek is the one that is selling his photos, not you, that gives him alot more right to speak freely about "art" and photography than any of you shit disturbers will.
If I were him, I'd stop posting pictures on these forums, obviously alot of you don't appreciate it. That is what I'd do, it is a good thing hes alot more mellow than me.
I'm defending someone I haven't even met because everyones ignorance shines through on this stupid art vs photography , digital vs film whatever.
:werd:
Rosscofat
05-27-2004, 05:31 PM
i think he shouldnt stop.. that take away from the ppl who DO want to see his photos
Shocker
05-27-2004, 05:39 PM
BEEEAMM!!!
NelsonRyder
05-27-2004, 05:44 PM
BEEEAAAAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!
Rosscofat
05-27-2004, 05:48 PM
Bounce?
BuckChoklit
05-27-2004, 06:08 PM
my blood pressure, that the fuck are you tlkaing about? I'm an 18 year old kids who runs 15km a week. My blood pressure is just fine thank you! I just have my points to make and I made them. Good luck in your photo career, I just hope to hell that you don't take away fomr more legitamate photographers...
Battlecat
05-27-2004, 06:11 PM
What you mean about take away form other photographers?
why are they bad pictures?
Rosscofat
05-27-2004, 06:15 PM
hahah can you name legit photraphers..?
Originally posted by BuckChoklit
my blood pressure, that the fuck are you tlkaing about? I'm an 18 year old kids who runs 15km a week. My blood pressure is just fine thank you! I just have my points to make and I made them. Good luck in your photo career, I just hope to hell that you don't take away fomr more legitamate photographers...
Whoa boy....you special :rolleyes:
Derek needs to keep posting rad photos and people like buck here need to realize that being an asshole on a public forum isn't going to make a shitload of difference.
I like the pretty ladies and I like the bicycle riding, the fact that DP's work is even nicer to look at than most photographers' just makes me happier.
Consider this a bump so that people can keep looking at cool photos.
The Ito
freerider guy
05-27-2004, 06:56 PM
I like the pictars very much. I take pictars as well. I use film in mine carara. I use a darkroam. I dodge and burn pictars. Plaese hit me also then. I want to take pictars as good as yors one day but i suck at darkroam. Any advise on little light pictars from other film peeps. like when i'm running things like 2.8 f-stop and 1/60 speed and no flash. do i shoot film at one iso up (200iso but shoot at 400 or 400 at 800) and push process it at the same speed or just buy the higher iso. both gets more grainy but which is better?? thanks
pedalfile
05-27-2004, 07:15 PM
Originally posted by derekpearson
pedalfile, when I posted pictures in this thread, I didnt mean to give you the impression I was trying to one up your man:dizzy:
i think your picture is good. really. i guess my internet sarcasm just flew by your digital camera lens
;)
wgchase
05-27-2004, 07:23 PM
sometimes sarcasm is hard to spot on this dang intranette/webbe#$#&*#@!^!@&@#
this guy got airlifted to the hospital down at seaotter, but turned out alright.
http://www.derekpearson.com/ouch.jpg
wgchase
05-27-2004, 07:29 PM
these girls werent at sea otter
http://www.derekpearson.com/p.jpg
BuckChoklit
05-27-2004, 07:34 PM
Originally posted by Demo9
Having to listen to live music only must really suck.
I don't listen to music, it rots the brain...
Rosscofat
05-27-2004, 07:36 PM
hey derek what kinda lighting are you useing in that last pic with the girls?
BuckChoklit
05-27-2004, 07:38 PM
Originally posted by Rosscofat
hahah can you name legit photraphers..?
Sterling Lorrence, Derek Frankowski, Scott Serfas, Glenn Milligan, Mark Losey, Harooki Noguchi, Anes Morales.......
What are you trying to get at Fatty?
Rosscofat
05-27-2004, 07:41 PM
and what makes them Pro or Legit? hey derek what happend to slam city jam photos?
is that why Ian hylands isint on there because he uses digital? lol
they all shoot subjects with a camera.. just like derek. I dont see any diff. Unless you think because they use FILM means they are better.. I posted a link to sports illstra about there digital film shit.. are you saying all of them arent legit?
geez..
wgchase
05-27-2004, 07:53 PM
Originally posted by Rosscofat
and what makes them Pro or Legit? hey derek what happend to slam city jam photos?
is that why Ian hylands isint on there because he uses digital? lol
they all shoot subjects with a camera.. just like derek. I dont see any diff. Unless you think because they use FILM means they are better.. I posted a link to sports illstra about there digital film shit.. are you saying all of them arent legit?
geez..
ah just ignore him- hes either realy ignorant or just pushing buttons.. ;)
Actually by official standards Im pro now too. Im making a pretty regular income these days with it.
As far as the lighting, I used a strobe mounted at the top of the doorjamb and shot through a sheet that I folded over a few times to diffuse the light and tacked on either side of the door.
Then i put a flash on the floor and shot it through a 48 inch diffuser. I wanted to put a flash in the tub, but they put bubble bath in there forsome shots that we never got to because it was too late. We have another shoot scheduled tho :)
Rosscofat
05-27-2004, 08:19 PM
sounds good.. im getting a remote soon.. and I guess a defuser is a good Idea.
BuckChoklit
05-27-2004, 08:43 PM
Originally posted by Rosscofat
and what makes them Pro or Legit? hey derek what happend to slam city jam photos?
is that why Ian hylands isint on there because he uses digital? lol
they all shoot subjects with a camera.. just like derek. I dont see any diff. Unless you think because they use FILM means they are better.. I posted a link to sports illstra about there digital film shit.. are you saying all of them arent legit?
geez..
I just didnt out in Ian Hylands because I don't like his photos..
AND FUCK! for the last time! This isn't a fucking film vs. digital debate! It's a raw real photograph vs. I photoshop the hell out of my pictures debate!
SHEESH!
shore king
05-27-2004, 08:49 PM
pics r pics. yes. film is a lil more proffeisonal but whatever
Battlecat
05-27-2004, 08:49 PM
Buck
who are you?
Dom@nsmb.com
05-27-2004, 08:53 PM
Great pics Derek, keep it up:)
BuchChoklit,
You gave your honest opinion, now give it a rest.
Rosscofat
05-27-2004, 08:58 PM
hahaha so u think ALL OF THEM dont touch there photos? lol
BuckChoklit
05-27-2004, 09:38 PM
Originally posted by BP
Buck
who are you?
Jim Rock, why?
Who are you?
BuckChoklit
05-27-2004, 09:39 PM
Originally posted by Dom@nsmb.com
Great pics Derek, keep it up:)
BuchChoklit,
You gave your honest opinion, now give it a rest.
I'll try....
white ri0t
05-27-2004, 09:46 PM
A bitch is a bitch.
h4mst3r
05-27-2004, 10:20 PM
canon's got this new thing where they encode the digital image with something so that you cant make any changes in an imaging program.
some kinda wysiwig encoding to please the purists... and national geographic
as for film vs. digital i think the film guys are threatened because any yoo-hoo with 5 grand can buy up the top gear and be just as good of a photographer or better because their success rates are dramatically higher.
film guys racked their brains for years to learn proper exposure metering, DOF, shutter speed, and flash control in a million different situations while any old joe with a digital point and shoot, TTL flash, all the bells and whistles can take basically the same picture and photoshop it all until its right
digital guys can gear up, come in right away, compete and saturate the industry. competition isnt a bad thing though! film guys arent at a complete disadvantage.
there will still be a niche for film. it will never go away.
think about it... colour "killed" black and white, colour negatives "killed" transparencies, prints "killed" paintings, motorcycles "killed" bicycles, internal combustion "killed" horse drawn carriages, video killed the radio star, and so on and so on!
digital is commercially viable.
film can be an even more exclusive club, which is what its looking like right now...
but guys like chump will always suck regardless
white ri0t
05-27-2004, 10:24 PM
^^and environmentally friendly, zero operating cost and instant gratification.
Midas
05-27-2004, 10:33 PM
Nice shots, but your sige is annoyingly large.
Battlecat
05-27-2004, 11:19 PM
Originally posted by BuckChoklit
Jim Rock, why?
Who are you?
My names Geoff
I was just wondering
BuckChoklit
05-28-2004, 12:13 AM
Originally posted by h4mst3r
canon's got this new thing where they encode the digital image with something so that you cant make any changes in an imaging program.
some kinda wysiwig encoding to please the purists... and national geographic
as for film vs. digital i think the film guys are threatened because any yoo-hoo with 5 grand can buy up the top gear and be just as good of a photographer or better because their success rates are dramatically higher.
film guys racked their brains for years to learn proper exposure metering, DOF, shutter speed, and flash control in a million different situations while any old joe with a digital point and shoot, TTL flash, all the bells and whistles can take basically the same picture and photoshop it all until its right
digital guys can gear up, come in right away, compete and saturate the industry. competition isnt a bad thing though! film guys arent at a complete disadvantage.
there will still be a niche for film. it will never go away.
think about it... colour "killed" black and white, colour negatives "killed" transparencies, prints "killed" paintings, motorcycles "killed" bicycles, internal combustion "killed" horse drawn carriages, video killed the radio star, and so on and so on!
digital is commercially viable.
film can be an even more exclusive club, which is what its looking like right now...
but guys like chump will always suck regardless
Probably one of the best posts ever made on this board.
Painting_of_Rebelion
05-28-2004, 02:24 AM
Burning and Dodging...leaving it in the developer for longer, filters, short stop bath times BLAH BLAH BLAH...a darkroom is the same thing as Photosop guy's... it may be a harder bit of work, but in the end it's the same result eh ;)
nice pics Derek...
Chump
05-28-2004, 02:27 AM
Originally posted by h4mst3r
but guys like chump will always suck regardless
Grow the fuck up honestly! Sorry for my language but I am tired of this. I left this thread, gave Derek a PM as he knows how the internet sarcasim goes, just like pedafile said and said sorry a long time before this thread ever got to page 3. Yes sorry I hi jacked Dereks thread, I can admit to my mistake, but not once dissed out saying his stuff sucked. So again grow the fuck up, seems like that is all you have to do all day is sit on the WWW and get off over forum topics! Go to school, work or ride your bike!
Steve
Painting_of_Rebelion
05-28-2004, 02:31 AM
wow, people are workin out all kinds of issues on the board tonight eh :rolleyes:
danny
05-28-2004, 08:20 AM
Originally posted by Chump
Grow the fuck up honestly!
Sometimes the best thing to do is to listen to your own advice.
Nice pics Derek, keep em coming.
Lady Gravity
05-28-2004, 09:34 AM
wow nice pics derek :eek:
the debate seems a little pissy though...come on guys, grow up :mad:
Mountain Dewd
05-28-2004, 09:43 AM
I am so confused about this thread:???:
What is going on?
Anyway i like the sea otter photos, wish i coulda been there.
btw, how can any of you guys stand by derek, he's american:eek:
wgchase
05-28-2004, 10:18 AM
Originally posted by ito
Derek, did you happen to get a picture of a kid on a Kona Chute with a sherman? I was sucking it up as it was my first time on a bike in 7 months....but if you managed to snap one I'd love to see it.
The Ito
oops, missed this in all the foray :) Can you give me more info?
number plate event etc??
danny
05-28-2004, 10:20 AM
Originally posted by wisc fr-rider
btw, how can any of you guys stand by derek, he's american:eek:
His name isn't George Bush!
wgchase
05-28-2004, 10:22 AM
Originally posted by shor3 whor3
Nice shots, but your sige is annoyingly large.
agreed and taken care of
wgchase
05-28-2004, 10:25 AM
Originally posted by Lady Gravity
wow nice pics derek :eek:
thanks LG and all others who havent taken my posting some photographs as a personal insult :P
mudpuppy
05-28-2004, 10:32 AM
Thanks for the pics Derek, as always they are great. Good to hear you are making money at it now.....:D
Grimace
05-28-2004, 11:03 AM
Originally posted by Chump
Grow the fuck up honestly! Sorry for my language but I am tired of this. I left this thread, gave Derek a PM as he knows how the internet sarcasim goes, just like pedafile said and said sorry a long time before this thread ever got to page 3. Yes sorry I hi jacked Dereks thread, I can admit to my mistake, but not once dissed out saying his stuff sucked. So again grow the fuck up, seems like that is all you have to do all day is sit on the WWW and get off over forum topics! Go to school, work or ride your bike!
Steve
its jsut cameras and bikes guys, lol i like dereks photos and yours too chump
Battlecat
05-28-2004, 11:21 AM
Why is everyone being such assholes to everyone?
why dont you jsut let people do what they love to do and stop bitching at them saying they suck and others are better at them.
There will always be someone better then you out there.
Stop telling people that they suck. There is no point in it
corey@nsmb.com
05-28-2004, 11:38 AM
Originally posted by BOUCH
What are you saying? I see on avrage a hundred of your posts to his one maby you should take your own advice?
ENOUGH.
Use your pm's for your personal trash like this or get off the boards.
Thanks.
Corey
aShogunNamedMarcus
05-28-2004, 02:40 PM
Originally posted by derekpearson
thanks LG and all others who havent taken my posting some photographs as a personal insult :P
That'd be me too then. Be proud of your work! Its nice and I think the 95% of the people who see it definately like it and appreciate you sharing it.
Dislike is usually from people being envious or seeing something they wish they had in themselves or could do themselves. And before someone flies off the handle with that, its the net, get over it and relax :beer:
thx DP.
.glib
05-28-2004, 02:47 PM
Originally posted by derekpearson
thanks LG and all others who havent taken my posting some photographs as a personal insult :P
Pistol duel at dawn. You can set up your camera on a timer if you want to capture your death.
eddiebrannan
05-28-2004, 03:04 PM
i guess the moral of the story is don't name a thread "rubbish" because it will just end up deserving it.
wgchase
05-28-2004, 03:13 PM
Originally posted by eddiebrannan
i guess the moral of the story is don't name a thread "rubbish" because it will just end up deserving it.
right. I apologize. this threadde was all my fault.
thanks for the words of wisdom ! :r:
eddiebrannan
05-28-2004, 03:15 PM
just a joke derek. i think all the bashing in this thread has made you overly sensitive
eddiebrannan
05-28-2004, 03:16 PM
:r:
just ride
05-28-2004, 03:31 PM
your girls need bigger boobs derek, those girls do nothing for me :(
i like all your pictures, if you didnt have a watermark i could point your pictures out among others, cause they just stand out so nice.
"if you hate a person, you hate something in him that is part of yourself, what isnt part of ourselves doesnt disturb us"
-hermann hesse
wheres the love:heart:
niXon
05-28-2004, 03:53 PM
I love Derek Pearsons Threads :heart:
What I find so amusing is how dereks gets bashed for 9 pages when he shows everyone some amazing photos. Steve gets one thing said to him and goes typical "Chump" and begins to bitch and moan about it. Grow up, if you cant handle shit like this over the internet I cant imagine how you deal with people in real life.
Bouch and Whoever Posted on His account = :lol: About time someone said something.
fergs
05-28-2004, 05:09 PM
Originally posted by h4mst3r
...
as for film vs. digital i think the film guys are threatened because any yoo-hoo with 5 grand can buy up the top gear and be just as good of a photographer or better because their success rates are dramatically higher.
film guys racked their brains for years to learn proper exposure metering, DOF, shutter speed, and flash control in a million different situations while any old joe with a digital point and shoot, TTL flash, all the bells and whistles can take basically the same picture and photoshop it all until its right
...
but guys like chump will always suck regardless
And back to normal debating...
A couple of things:
1. Not any yoo-hoo can be just as good as a "film guy": Fancy digital cameras (and film cameras) with auto-exposure ability certainly help take better photos, but I've yet to see a fancy camera with auto-composure ability. When it comes down to it, if the photographer can't compose a shot, then $100,000 worth of gear isn't going to do much for them.
2. Guys like chump will always suck? Ouch. Harsh. Chump's taken a lot of decent shots IMO.
pedalfile
05-28-2004, 05:11 PM
CHUMP RULES..... end of story
Rosscofat
05-28-2004, 06:08 PM
hey derek.. what happend to the slam city pictures?
.glib
05-28-2004, 06:12 PM
If I were to have intercourse with a male chimp, would that make me gay?
Rosscofat
05-28-2004, 06:13 PM
yes it would.. but if he did it with u. you have jsut been raped :D
corey@nsmb.com
05-28-2004, 06:19 PM
Originally posted by .glib
If I were to have intercourse with a male chimp, would that make me gay?
You are going to get this thread canned if you guys keep filling it with garbage.
Rosscofat
05-28-2004, 06:22 PM
I think it should be canned but then thats not fair to dereks pictures
.glib
05-28-2004, 06:24 PM
Originally posted by corey@nsmb.com
You are going to get this thread canned if you guys keep filling it with garbage.
Trying to keep the tone light there Corey. I also like how the example 'garbage' is a joke (tastefulness and quality of which aside for a second), and not the massive personal attacks in the other pages of the thread.
But hey, I'm always glad to provide an example of garbage.
Universe
05-28-2004, 06:44 PM
Originally posted by .glib
Trying to keep the tone light there Corey. I also like how the example 'garbage' is a joke (tastefulness and quality of which aside for a second), and not the massive personal attacks in the other pages of the thread.
But hey, I'm always glad to provide an example of garbage.
Agreed. Personal attacks. Ok. Random comment. Not ok.
Can the thread.
Broken Fusion!
05-28-2004, 10:41 PM
Derek Pearson this is the last time you insult me, I'm coming down there to destroy you!
Really good pictures, I wish I could take nice ones like that. Too bad flamers came and f'd around in your thread
pedalfile
05-28-2004, 10:49 PM
derek, you have nice pictures sir. im sorry if i came across as a bad guy, seeing that i am really a nice fellow
good day to you
.243racer
05-28-2004, 11:34 PM
if you step back and look at it (the situation), everyone who has posted crap etc... in this thread is a big dork.... jesus find somthing better to do....
you have all lowered yourself in my eyes.... (probably many others)
now just let this thread die....
Sorry derek fot he above statment, I for one really like your pics...
most of all the biking ones.... those are awsome...
just a comment on the portraits... there seem to be somthing just "off" i don't know what it is.. and i cannot put my finger on it...
maybe its the composition....
good work anyways:)
wgchase
05-29-2004, 06:38 AM
Originally posted by Broken Fusion!
Derek Pearson this is the last time you insult me, I'm coming down there to destroy you!
:lol:
and thanks :)
wgchase
05-29-2004, 06:45 AM
Originally posted by pedalfile
derek, you have nice pictures sir. im sorry if i came across as a bad guy, seeing that i am really a nice fellow
good day to you
I appreciate that - no hard feelings here:)
243 racer. Thanks for the comments as well. My portraits do need work of course. Ive only just started experimenting with those in the past couple of weeks. Time and practice! Im still trying to get used to the fact that beautiful women who are complete strangers are willing to take off thier clothes in front of my camera. Once I get past that, Ill start thinking about composition/mood etc ;)
Now heres Jimmy
http://www.derekpearson.com/images/jimmy.jpg
wgchase
05-29-2004, 06:48 AM
Originally posted by just ride
i like all your pictures, if you didnt have a watermark i could point your pictures out among others, cause they just stand out so nice.
:heart:
and when I get some models that fit your requirements, Ill send you a link :P
Uncle Duke
05-29-2004, 07:23 AM
whoa I just used up 20 min reading all this BS. The photos are pretty damn good.As far as puritan arguments go , thats fukked we kive in 2004 are you not using a computer to read these words?
This is just another classic example of how almost EVERY thread on here turns into a hating/bash affair. Where's the love?...its mtn biking and shit after all. Everybody give yourself a hug. I remember when mtn bikers just hated roadies.
.243racer
05-29-2004, 12:32 PM
Originally posted by duke
This is just another classic example of how almost EVERY thread on here turns into a hating/bash affair. Where's the love?...its mtn biking and shit after all. Everybody give yourself a hug. I remember when mtn bikers just hated roadies.
i think everbody who bashes people are just venting anger towards their own insecurities
Emmens
05-30-2004, 02:02 AM
you people are fat
NooNer
05-30-2004, 10:44 AM
wow ... 11 pages later and figuring out wtf is going on hurts my brain.
derek, you got some really good pictures going on here. the last one you posted is doep!
if everyone wants to bitch and moan about people needing to be "pure" photographers and such. look into the old schoolers like ansel adams. now that man did some amazing things for his times.
again, good shots derek
steve.
just ride
05-30-2004, 02:08 PM
Originally posted by derekpearson
:heart:
and when I get some models that fit your requirements, Ill send you a link :P
:lol:
:woot:
freerider guy
05-30-2004, 02:16 PM
Originally posted by NooNer
if everyone wants to bitch and moan about people needing to be "pure" photographers and such. look into the old schoolers like ansel adams. now that man did some amazing things for his times.
OMG! OMG!!!! I'm doing a photo prodject on Ansel Adams right now!! Yah f/64 club represent!!!
scottvelez
06-01-2004, 10:26 AM
Wow, some of you guys are just plain angry. And for what reason?
Some of you slam everything Derek posts. Others slam everything <insert other photographer name here> posts. Lame, lame, lame! Time to grow up me thinks.
Like it or not, even film based photography is going digital. Pros who still shoot film, routinely scan the film, then edit and print digitally. Photoshop is the tool of choice and even if you don't use it, your magazine or book editor WILL before the image is posted or goes to print. Some form of digital processing is standard in almost every image production you can think of. It's here to stay. Get over it. Nobody wants to go back to the days of old dirty enlargers and make prints with dust, hair and scratches. To slam someone for using particular equipment or technology is lame. Especially when most of you doing the bitching don't know shit about photography in the first place and even less about the specifics of film and digital technologies.
Derek does some really good work.
I don't like everything he shoots, but I REALLY like some of it. I don’t give a shit if he shot them on the latest digital SLR or with a pinhole camera, some toilet paper and a sponge. What matters is how it looks and how it makes me feel when I see it.
Don't knock him for the tools he uses. They are just tools. A chef is not a good cook because of the frying pan he uses! Equipment can improve a shot, but first you must have an EYE and a VISION of what you can do. He does! Most of you would be hard pressed to do half of what Derek does with ten times the equipment.
So suck it up princess. If you think the competition on this board is tough, wait until you get a real photo job. You'll be forced to get past your jealously very quickly if you want to make it in life. You might as well start now.
eeyun
06-01-2004, 10:41 AM
Originally posted by scottv
Wow....
Thank you Scott!!!! You hit the nail on the head.
:clap:
eddiebrannan
06-01-2004, 11:08 AM
just looked at some work shot using a phase one back on a hasselblad. spontenaity of 35mm and the detail of 8" x 10". a beauty shot you could zoom into and individual eyelashes wouldn't be pixelated. no film grain so the raw file once processed is the equivalent of a 100meg file. incredible, incredible quality with the ease of shooting of a 35mm slr.
i've been shooting since way before there were digital cameras, and i'm completely passionate about photography of all kinds. i love using film and i love being in the darkroom, and i also love what you can do with this stuff.
a camera is way way more than simply a recording device.
scottvelez
06-02-2004, 09:52 PM
Phase One gear rocks.
To bad it won't fit in my camelbak or my bank account!
Stinky_Rider
06-04-2004, 12:04 AM
wow, four pages of rubbish.
Except for the random photos inbetween which derek posted, the huge x-up shot is sweet, nice low key for sure
barry
06-04-2004, 04:19 PM
i only come look at these threads cuz your the king of controversy. i couldnt care less about your shots :D
wgchase
06-05-2004, 12:19 AM
Originally posted by barry
i only come look at these threads cuz your the king of controversy. i couldnt care less about your shots :D
:lol:
wgchase
06-01-2005, 05:57 PM
this is the longest thread I ever created
Grumster
06-01-2005, 06:19 PM
I cant even see the pics.
scottvelez
06-03-2005, 06:28 PM
I forgot how good this thread was... Nice Friday Afternoon Read!
Now, where are the pictures everyone was talking about? All I see is text.
VanIslandWarrior
06-05-2005, 12:23 PM
ya, it kinda makes it hard to have an opinion on there little E-Battle... when all we see is text.
Taylor_P
06-05-2005, 10:55 PM
why'd you take your pics down?
vBulletin® v3.7.0 Release Candidate 2, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.