Black

[marksnet]

I GOT MY BLACKS BACK. THEY ARE THE BEST FORK FOR SHOX THERE IS. 3" WHITE BLACK.

[Captain Da]

you're starting to sound like bouch

(or maybe your posts are always like this and i just didn't notice?)

[C.C.]

Originally posted by marksnet
I GOT MY BLACKS BACK. THEY ARE THE BEST FORK FOR SHOX THERE IS. 3" WHITE BLACK.

oxymoron.

[pedalfile]

shocker forks? this is new to me...

[Keefer]

A 3" white Black?! nice!

I don't understand why they made the "Black"s in more than just black. Or why they didn't call em something different.

[BAC5.2]

Originally posted by marksnet
I GOT MY BLACKS BACK. THEY ARE THE BEST FORK FOR SHOX THERE IS. 3" WHITE BLACK.

Why is it plural in your first sentance, and then singular in your second sentance?

Why do people constantly pluralize the word "fork" anyway? It just doesnt make gramatical sense.

"I just got a new set of forks on my bike." That doesn't make any sense at all.

"I just got a new fork on my bike." That makes sense.

A fork for a bicycle is nothing like a pair of pants, but rather more like a bra, or a dinner fork.

You never say "I need a new set of bras," or "hey mom, get me some forks for my mac and cheese."

I guess I am missing something.

[switch]

Originally posted by BAC5.2
A fork for a bicycle is nothing like a pair of pants, but rather more like a bra, or a dinner fork.

Why a pair of pants? What does one pant look like?

[BAC5.2]

Originally posted by switch
Why a pair of pants? What does one pant look like?

When you come to a fork in the road, and you go right, have you taken the forks? With a pair of pants, you insert your right leg, and you can still insert your left leg.

Perhaps the pluralization has a meaning such as that you must systematically go about the use of the item. With pants, you insert one leg, then the other. But with a bra, bike fork, or dinner fork, you do it all at once.

Maybe I'll ask my english professor on wednsday.

[switch]

Originally posted by BAC5.2
When you come to a fork in the road, and you go right, have you taken the forks? With a pair of pants, you insert your right leg, and you can still insert your left leg.

A fork is a singular item, which it describes. I suppose pants is a singular word too that is not pluralized, but then again it is a pair, whereas a fork is singular.

[BAC5.2]

Grammar is a nasty little bitch.

Could be designated due to what it holds or accomplishes. A pair of pants holds your legs (plural), but a fork only holds a wheel (singular). Any possible conflicts would be designated as singular, or based on the whole picture (i.e. a bra holds two boobs, but goes around your torso [singular] and is thus designated as singular).

Fuck grammar.

[switch]

"English" and "grammar" in the same sentence is an oxymoron.

As for the original topic, I'd like to see a pair of white Blacks.

[tHEdIRT]

i think pants used to be in two peices

[BAC5.2]

Originally posted by tHEdIRT
i think pants used to be in two peices

Like I said, Grammer is a nasty bitch.

[white ri0t]

I like the fork.


P.S. Nerds.

P.P.S. while on the topic of grammar, BAC, you donut have to use apostrophes when things are plural. You only use them when things are possesive or abbreviated.

[BAC5.2]

I skipped that day in English, lol. Come to think of it, I skipped/was tardy to a lot of English classes in high school.

[switch]

It is a "pair" of pants. "Pair" implies plural, and therefore the 's' at the end of "pant". You say "pant leg", not "pants leg". You say "what brand of fork is on your bike" and not "what brand of forks is on your bike".

As for off topic, Derek, when's your website gonna be up?

[downstairs]

how much are blacks?

[white ri0t]

Originally posted by BAC5.2
Like I said, Grammer is a nasty bitch.

grammar ;)

[BAC5.2]

Fuck. The one time I don't spell the word correctly, someone catches it.

I never said I had the worlds best grammar, but at least I put some effort into it.

[marksnet]

what the heck this is super old i dont got those shocks no mo i got fox vannilla rlc's :)

[BAC5.2]

Why do you have more than one?

[marksnet]

yes i got the left leg and the right leg making SHACKS

[Monster Mike]

For example Bac wears leather chaps when he gives it to him mother.

Chaps come in two pieces, and one is for right leg one is for left leg. Mother can only recieve in one designated sector at once so she is not plural. There is a possibility to take it in multiple areas but only one is utilized at once. There for she is not pluralized.

[Ashek]

Originally posted by Monster Mike
For example Bac wears leather chaps when he gives it to him mother.
you mean his mother?

[Ashek]

Originally posted by Monster Mike
For example Bac wears leather chaps when he gives it to him mother.

Chaps come in two pieces, and one is for right leg one is for left leg. Mother can only recieve in one designated sector at once so she is not plural. There is a possibility to take it in multiple areas but only one is utilized at once. There for she is not pluralized.

What if your a child of a lesbian-bi relationship, you would therefor have two mothers, to be able to give it to at the same time... if you were so inclined.. but you would also be named Oedipus Rex.